Director: Simon Fellows
Cast: Jean-Claude Van Damme, Julie Cox, Alan McKenna, William Tapley, Razaaq Adoti, Velibor Topic, Warren Derosa, Ian Virgo, Raffaello Degruttola Raffaello Degruttola, Serban Celea, Vlad Ivanov, Vlad Ivanov, Razvan Oprea, Mihai Bisericanu, Colin Stinton
Running Time: 92 min.
By Kyle Warner
After reading the post by Jeff Bona on the influential career in action movies that Jean-Claude Van Damme has had (āThe Most āRemadeā Action Starā), I realized that Iād only seen a small number of the actorās films. So, I decided to change that, and over the past six months Iāve caught up with a lot of the JCVD films Iāve missed over the years. In doing so, I became a fan of the guy, and was introduced to many good movies and more than a few bad ones.
⦠Second in Command is one of the bad ones.
In my time exploring the filmography of Van Damme, the star has worked with many high-concept ideas but rarely seems to deal with important, real-world issues. Second in Command is one of the rare political action movies that Iāve seen starring The Muscles from Brussels. However, its attempt to convey a political message beyond āAmericans good, communists badā never fully develops (in fact, Iām not sure there even is a message beyond that). For a movie that begins with the burning of the American flag, things soon play out very safe and predictable. That flag burning is an act of protest thatās amusingly largely ignored by traffic and civilians and only has one photographer present to document it all. A protest lacking an audience seems to defeat the point of having a protest, I would think⦠Oohhh, I know. Maybe the lack of an audience for the protesters reflects the lack of an audience for the movie. Howās that for film criticism?
Second in Command basically plays out like the season premiere of a particularly unimaginative season of 24. Jean-Claude Van Damme plays the French-accent version of Jack Bauer by the name of Commander Samuel Keenan and he comes with Jackās reputation for going rogue, surviving ticking clock scenarios, and a tendency to piss off terrorists wherever he goes. Sam Keenanās been called into the small Eastern European nation of Moldavia to join the US Embassy there. Not long after he arrives, a faction representing the countryās communist past rises up and attempts to overthrow the government. Because the Moldavian Presidentās military is conveniently off doing training exercises in the mountains, itās up to the good olā US-of-A to step in and save the day. Sam Keenan swoops in, picks up the President, and returns him to the US Embassy where they will endure a last stand and wait for backup to arrive. Second in Command thinks its situation is a bit like The Alamo. āGood movie,ā says one character. No one will be saying that about this film.
The film clearly lacks a decent budget but that doesnāt explain some of its poor decision making. Beyond Van Damme, the cast is made up of mostly no-name actorsāand I have nothing against thatābut many of them are no good. More puzzling is how many actors resemble each other. Youād think that if you donāt have the cash for bigger names that youād go for diversity and variety in your cast. Nope. Two villains look enough alike that I thought they were the same guy until I saw them in two different places. The way the film is shot also shows some odd choices. It switches from the usual camerawork to a camera thatās meant to remind the viewer of live news broadcast. Instead, it just draws attention to its lack of money and looks more like something shot on video. On top of all that, the filmās editing is frantic, completely chopping up otherwise impressive explosions or stunt pieces (one part has an RPG blowing a hole in the embassyāit looks good but the editing ruins it, trying to show the sequence from a dozen unnecessary angles). Sometimes it even jumps between the different film styles during these moments of action, throwing me completely out of the movie. Itās annoying when a film manages to look even cheaper than it probably actually is.
Letās talk about Van Damme for a moment, since heās the main reason someone would think to pick this up. I canāt remember the actor ever looking so bored on screen before. Thereās no fire there. His gaze remains vacant even during the scenes that are supposed to be dramatic shifting points, like heās already dreaming of being far away. As far as the action goes, most the film is limited to dull gunfights. Only in the finale do we see the martial arts Van Dammeās known for. Itās not a bad scene but itās definitely not worth the wait. However, that fight is performed inside the US Embassy with an active sprinkler system, which basically allows JCVD to have a fight in the rain INDOORS. So, check that one off the fight scene bucket list, I guess.
Itās basically a bad movie from top to bottom. As I work my way through the films of Jean-Claude Van Damme, itās sometimes difficult to tell which ones should be skipped. Well, hereās one of the skippable films. Second in Command is dull as dishwater⦠Hmm. You know, now that Iām thinking about it, what has dishwater ever done to get the reputation of being dull? I really canāt say it deserves such a rep. Itās nasty and I gotta use gloves because damn, what if thereās a piece of a noodle floating around in there? Like the garbage compacter from Star Wars, my dishwater is never dull. Second in Command sure is, though! So, I say we grant dishwater a reprieve. Itās suffered a false reputation for far too long. From now on I shall say that something is ādull as Second in Command.ā No one will know what the hell Iām talking about, but Iāll know⦠Oh yes, Iāll knowā¦
Kyle Warner’s Rating: 3/10


















I, too, will know what you’re talking about. š