Jack Reacher: Never Go Back (2016) Review

“Jack Reacher” Korean Theatrical Poster

“Jack Reacher” Korean Theatrical Poster

AKA: Jack Reacher 2
Director: Edward Zwick
Cast: Tom Cruise, Cobie Smulders, Aldis Hodge, Danika Yarosh, Patrick Heusinger, Holt McCallany, Austin Hebert, Robert Catrini, Robert Knepper, Talbott Lin
Running Time: 118 min.

By Paul Bramhall

The announcement that Tom Cruise was going to be playing Jack Reacher, the character of author Lee Child’s ongoing series of novels about an ex-military drifter that has an uncanny ability for finding trouble, was greeted (as expected) with almost universal disdain from fan of the books. However the 2012 thriller, simply titled Jack Reacher, helmed by frequent Cruise collaborator Christopher McQuarrie, was both a commercial and a critical success. Cruise brought the needed physicality to the role with gusto, portraying Reacher as a more grounded version of his Ethan Hunt character from the Mission: Impossible series – a comparison which was especially apt with the release of the bombastic Ghost Protocol just a year prior.

The success of Jack Reacher inevitably saw a sequel on the cards, and with twenty published novels to choose from, the second instalment of Jack Reacher on the big screen comes in the form of 2016’s Jack Reacher: Never Go Back, an adaption of the eighteenth book in the series. Much like the original came a year after Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol, so Never Go Back comes a year after Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation. Both the original Jack Reacher and Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation were helmed by Christopher McQuarrie, which sees this instalment being handed over to Edward Zwick, the director behind the likes of Blood Diamond and Legends of the Fall. Cruise and Zwick have worked together before, on 2003’s The Last Samurai, so the sequel can be considered as a reunion of sorts for the director and actor.

Cruise has become one of the few actors in Hollywood who has the ability to make straight faced action pictures, ones that don’t rely on either irony or CGI, nor suffer from a modest budget or straight-to-DVD release. In many ways he’s one of the last legitimate bankable stars, in an era were Hollywood has become almost solely reliant on reboots, remakes, and superhero movies. When people talk about Jason Bourne, they don’t say they want to go and see the latest Matt Damon movie, and similarly for James Bond, no one would say they want to go and see the latest Daniel Craig movie. But Cruise it’s the opposite, people don’t say they want to go and see the latest Ethan Hunt or Jack Reacher flick, they say let’s go and check out the latest Tom Cruise film. He’s a guy who consistently delivers the goods, with Never Go Back being only the second time he’s returned to play a character for a sequel, outside of the Mission: Impossible series.

Never Go Back continues the gritty down to earth feel that the original instalment established, with proceedings opening on a pair of cops arriving on the scene of a diner parking lot, were four men lay sprawled on the floor, each looking considerably battered and bruised. A witness points to a single customer sitting at the bar inside, his back to them calmly drinking a cup of coffee, and goes onto explain that it was the customer who singled handedly put the beat down on all four of them. The customer is of course Cruise, establishing himself as a man not to be messed with within the first 60 seconds, and he hasn’t even lifted a finger. The scene sets the tone both for the character and the rest of the run time, portraying Reacher as someone who treads just the right side of the line between confidence and arrogance, and isn’t afraid of getting his knuckles dirty.

Fans of the book may not have been happy with the casting of Cruise, but there’s no doubt that he owns the role, and looks to be using both his Mission: Impossible productions and the Jack Reacher series as vehicles to show off his action chops. At 54, he appears more determined than ever to throw as much physical action onscreen as possible, with people getting punched in the face through windscreens, arms (and various other limbs) being broken, and bodies being thrown into a variety of breakable surroundings. While Never Go Back, much like Jack Reacher, doesn’t rely on huge set pieces or death defying stunts, instead it succeeds by having its altercations take place in more real world trappings. Fights take place in dark abandoned warehouses, and in one particular scene, which shows a clear nod to the showdown between Iko Uwais and Cecep Arif Rahman in The Raid 2, in a restaurant kitchen (which includes a hammer wielding Cobie Smulders!).

For Never Go Back the inclusion of actresses Cobie Smulders and Danika Yarosh provide Cruise with a sort of adopted nuclear family. Smulders plays a former military colleague of Cruise, who’s been falsely imprisoned for espionage, while Yarosh finds herself in the cross hairs of those looking to take out both Cruise and Smulders, thanks to the possibility of her being his daughter. Cruise of course takes it on himself to break Smulders out of prison, convinced of her innocence, and the three end up on the run from a group of shadowy military contractors, who may be behind the murders of two soldiers in Afghanistan who were under Smulders command. It’s a straightforward plot, which doesn’t spend any time getting bogged down in sub-plots or romance, instead choosing to have one, two, or all three of them have to run as if their life depended on it at regular intervals.

In many ways it’s the simplicity of Never Go Back which makes it so appealing. It’s a trio of good guys (well, one guy and two women) trying to uncover the truth behind an injustice, while being relentlessly pursued by those who want to kill them. In an era which has Hollywood defining its action by how many CGI buildings it can destroy, it’s refreshing to watch a movie that gets the adrenaline pumping through intense foot chases, fist fights, explosions (real ones!), and painful looking falls. I’d take the action in Never Go Back any day of the week over watching a bunch of pixels be decimated onscreen. Of course, no hero is worth their salt without a worthy villain to go up against, and the villain here comes in the form of Patrick Heusinger, playing an ex-military man who’s now become an assassin for hire, and comes with a skillset that matches those of Cruise.

Heusinger is almost Terminator-like in his pursuit of Cruise, spurred on by being determined to prove that he’s the better of the two at combat. The pair get into two suitably violent confrontations during the runtime, the first being the previously mentioned kitchen brawl, and the last belonging to the finale. While it’s only speculation, I’m sure stunt coordinator Robert Alonzo, who was also the fight coordinator for the original Jack Reacher and Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol, must be a fan of Asian action cinema. I say this not only based on the kitchen fight which has echoes of The Raid 2, but in the finale there’s a part in which both Cruise and Heusinger throw each other off the top of a building while grappling, before dusting themselves off and continuing to fight on the ground. It’s a scene that’s reminiscent of a similar fall that happens between Donnie Yen and Colin Chou in the finale of Flash Point, and delivers just as much impact.

While it can easily be argued that Never Go Back would be a pretty run-of-the-mill thriller without the presence of Cruise, and many critics have, the same comparison could be made by saying Police Story would be a pretty average cops and robbers movie without Jackie Chan. The fact is that it’s Cruise that makes the movie what is it, and that is a lean, mean, action thriller. There’s little doubt that based on the success of the sequel, we can probably expect to see more of Jack Reacher over the coming years, and as long as Cruise is still up to delivering the type of physical performance that he’s clocked in here, then that’s definitely a good thing. My only wish would be that before everyone gets too old, we get a movie that gives us Jack Reacher, John Wick, and Arthur Bishop, all sharing the screen together. We can dream right?

Paul Bramhall’s Rating: 8/10



This entry was posted in All, News, Other Movies, Reviews and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Jack Reacher: Never Go Back (2016) Review

  1. “When people talk about Jason Bourne, they don’t say they want to go and see the latest Matt Damon movie, and similarly for James Bond, no one would say they want to go and see the latest Daniel Craig movie. But Cruise it’s the opposite, people don’t say they want to go and see the latest Ethan Hunt or Jack Reacher flick, they say let’s go and check out the latest Tom Cruise film.”

    Great point above. I think other actors that come close to that example are Arnie and Sly. But then again, when a new Terminator or Rambo movie comes out, people do say “a new Terminator movie is out” or “a new Rambo movie is out”… so half scratch that. Maybe Jackie Chan or Jet Li is a better example (even when Donnie comes out with an Ip Man movie, they say “a new Ip Man movie is out” is out) – but then, it all depends a lot on how knowledgeable about the subject or genre.

    As for Jack Reacher 2, I enjoyed it more than the last two MI film combined. However, I didn’t like it better than the original Jack Reacher flick. I definitely see the similarities of the two action scenes that mirror Flash Point and Raid 2. A solid 7/10 for me. I don’t care if Tom Cruise thinks L. Ron Hubbard is God. Tom is a bad ass.

    • Paul Bramhall says:

      Well, we’ll get to test your theory when both Jackie Chan and Arnie star together in ‘VIY 2’…let’s see which actor audiences reference when they say they’re going to see the flick!

      Agree about Cruise. Chan may have become a China pandering propaganda mouthpiece for the government, but people don’t complain half as much as they do about Cruise’s association with Scientology. I don’t agree with it at all, but then, it we were only going to watch movies featuring actors based on sharing their personal beliefs, we’d likely have a very small pool to choose from. As long as Cruise keeps pushing himself action wise, then you can keep on counting me in.

      & yes, I enjoyed this much more than ‘Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation’, which felt like a Jack Reacher flick being forced into the mould of a ‘Mission: Impossible’ production. ‘Never Go Back’ was a welcome return to gritty action movie basics.

  2. Zach says:

    I thought that Never Go Back was a big disappointment, as it barely represented the Jack Reacher character, featured a boring plot, and by the numbers action scenes that pale in comparison to McQuarrie’s masterwork in the original. If the original was a nice throwback to the patient and subtle action films of the 70s, the newest is representative of the bland post 2000s actioner with its reliance upon exposition and weak action scenes. I’m sorry guys, but I strongly disliked this film. Besides M:I:2, which is saved by its bonkers action sequences, this might be Cruise’s worst performance and film to date.

    • Paul Bramhall says:

      I’m not familiar with the Jack Reacher novels themselves, but will have to disagree on this being Cruise’s worst performance to date. Looking strictly at his post-‘Mission: Impossible’ career, which I’d say is when he really established himself as an action star (cemented by bringing on-board John Woo for the sequel), my vote would go to ‘Knight and Day’ for his worst movie (not sure if I could say he’s every really clocked in a bad performance). Cruise, Cameron Diaz, and action comedy just weren’t a good combination.

    • Like Paul, I’m not familiar with the novels, but I still know what you mean on how the first movie represented the Jack Reacher character as more of a mysterious, myth-like icon (i.e. John Wick). Part II felt more like a typical action movie. But you know, I went into it expecting a Tom Cruise action flick, and walked out satisfied. But yes, Part I was more of a gritty, no-nonsense ride.

      • Zach says:

        I agree it’s an enjoyable watch. I just feel like the first Jack Reacher was so well made, that I expected more out of Jack Reacher 2. I looked at some of my reviews for other action films this year, and I rated Hard Target 2, Mechanic: Resurrection, and Kickboxer: Vengeance higher than JR2, so maybe I went too easy on those because I didn’t expect a great story or high class filmmaking. As for Knight and Day, I would argue that Cruise at least shows more commitment and charisma in that film than this. While I agree Diaz is the worst, James Mangold directs some rather awesome shootouts for what could have been an otherwise lame romantic action comedy. While I do agree I’d rather have a Tom Cruise action film with a tone like JR2, I felt like Knight and Day was at least surprising.

        • That really reminds me, I have to see Knight and Day. Somehow, someway, I let all these years go by without having watched it.

          • HKFanatic says:

            I remember that Cruise’s charisma and comedic timing were the main thing that “Knight and Day” had going for it, along with a couple well-executed action setpieces. It’s worth a rental for Cruise fans, but as a theatrical experience (with a theatrical ticket price) I found it disappointing.

  3. HKFanatic says:

    Damn it, Paul! You’ve made me want to watch the Jack Reacher sequel just to see how much of that “Raid 2” influence bleeds through, despite the fact that I didn’t really care for the first film. I thought it certainly had its moments, including a great car chase orchestrated by director Christopher McQuarrie, but compared to the big-budget spectacle of the Mission: Impossible franchise, Jack Reacher has always felt like a made-for-TV movie that’s somehow on the big screen. But I’m an action junkie at the end of the day so we’ll see. I might just have to catch a matinee.

  4. Andrew Hernandez says:

    It’s amazing how Cruise continues to push himself at his age. He seems determined to be remembered as an action star.

    I liked Never Go Back, but the first movie was much better. It had the advantage of people like Werner Herzog and David Oyelowo for Cruise to play off of. Here, Colbie Smulders felt like the only other “quality” actor. The rest of the cast weren’t bad, but just felt “small scale.” (Although Heusinger was a good rival)

    The extended cut of Knight and Day was better. He action scenes have more detail, and the plot is better developed. I was disheartened when that movie was panned by critics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *