Logan (2017) Review

"Logan" Theatrical Poster

“Logan” Theatrical Poster

AKA: Logan: The Wolverine
Director: James Mangold

Cast: Hugh Jackman, Patrick Stewart, Richard E. Grant, Stephen Merchant, Boyd Holbrook, Dafne Keen, Elizabeth Rodriguez, Eriq La Salle, Elise Nea, Daniel Bernhardt
Running Time: 137 min.

By Zach Nix

James Mangold’s Logan is such an eventful film to someone as myself that I struggle to come up with an opening statement about it, as it marks the end of an unforgettable era in blockbuster and comic book superhero cinema that we should never forget, and it’s all thanks to one Hugh Jackman. Jackman has been playing the iconic X-Men character, Wolverine, for a whopping seventeen years now and across nine films. In Jackman’s lifetime as the character, we have been witness to two Batman’s, two Superman’s, two Fantastic Four teams, three Punisher’s, and three Spider-Man’s. And yet, Jackman has been that constant that we’ve all taken for granted, always appearing as the exact same character across a franchise that has recast other roles around him. Even though the X-Men franchise has seen its ups and downs, Wolverine has always been consistently great across all of them, even though the films that he occupied varied.

With Logan, Jackman finally bids his iconic character farewell and in a way that he has never been able to fully do before, through a hard R-rated and violent standalone adventure that doesn’t set up future films or sacrifice good storytelling for unnecessary universe building. It somewhat plays off the previous events of past X-Men films, but more so as if they were once told legends of a great hero, making Wolverine very much so a Clint Eastwood archetype along the lines of The Outlaw Josey Wales or Unforgiven, an aged gun blade-slinger with one last mission to complete. It also jumps far ahead into the damaged and nearly pre-apocalyptic future of 2029, very much so separating it from all preceding events of previous X-Men films. In today’s day and age of universe connecting/post-credits teasing/PG-13 comic book superhero films that all start to blend at one point or another, Logan is a unique breath of fresh air that reminds us of the old days when adult comic book adaptations like The Crow, Blade, The Punisher, and Watchmen treated audiences like adults and gave them stand alone stories that were films first and foremost, not products.

In this semi-standalone future, Wolverine/Logan (Hugh Jackman) is a wounded and beat down man who drives a limo around to make money and takes care of Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart) on a secluded property on the border of Mexico. One day on the job, Logan is confronted by Donald Pierce (Boyd Holbrook), a cyborg-like mercenary working for Transgien, a heavily financed research group in search of specific mutants. Pierce warns Logan that a woman in search of him is harboring a young girl, Lara (Dafne Keen), and that she possesses something of his. When Logan eventually comes into contact with Lara, he finds himself wrapped up in Transgien’s hunt for her and is forced into a situation where he must protect her and Xavier whilst throwing his own desires to the curb.

While I personally believe that every X-Men film has done a commendable job at portraying Wolverine whilst fleshing him out more and more with each installment, Logan is the definitive Wolverine film that fans have been clamoring for. Here, Logan is portrayed as a pessimistic and harsh superhuman who has let the cruel world around him finally get to him. While Logan has always been an easily agitated guy, the anti-mutant and unrelenting world of Logan shows his patience at a particularly low level, and to a somewhat comedic effect. He’s a frustrated guy who simply wants to look out for himself, but his penchant for helping the innocent forces him to do the morally righteous thing and sacrifice his own well-being for others. While I don’t want to dive into spoilers, I’ll leave it at kudos to Mangold for giving Logan a final arc to complete his character.

Logan is also next level in that it fully unleashes Wolverine as never seen before, slashing and dashing his way through enemies and foes in gory delight. Jackman has always showcased a full sense of dedication to the character, but he’s now more unhinged than ever before thanks to the R rating. Logan easily racks up his highest kill count to date, with the entire film rounding out as the most violent and death filled X-Men venture to date. Mangold sets the tone and level of violence in the picture with an opening scene where some hard looking Mexicans try to steal from Logan, resulting in a limb dismembering tussle. Another unique scene of action includes an incident in which Xavier’s powers freeze everyone in time whilst shaking the entire world around them, with only Logan able to work his way through the powerful mind attack, stabbing frozen henchmen along the way. And finally, a finale set in the woods goes all out, with Logan running towards mercenaries and gutting them left and right. In other words, this is the Wolverine rage mode that fans have been begging for, and Mangold delivers it in spades.

Much as Mangold did in The Wolverine, Logan draws heavily upon Western iconography, as well as other memorable genre efforts, for the character and look of the film. Besides the previously mentioned Eastwood similarities, the most obvious is Shane, as Mangold even shows the Western within the film, comparing Logan to the drifter himself. The film also draws from Mad Max, but not simply for its apocalyptic imagery, but also for its reluctant hero whom gets wrapped up in other people’s business because he’s morally righteous at heart, just like Max Rockatansky. There’s also a strong Sam Peckinpah influence on the picture with it’s over the top violence and Mexican border setting. Even flourishes of Sergio Leone seep into the picture, with groups of gunmen surrounding Logan before a burst of violence sets into effect. One can’t also help but notice the similarities between the Lone Wolf and Cub series and Logan’s road trip to protect the young Laura whom he acts as a surrogate father too. Plus, the guy uses blades, miniature swords essentially, as his signature weapon. What’s truly fantastic about all of these filmic influences is that Logan never feels like a rip-off of any of them, but more so a cinematic blender that ingests their influences and subtlely homages them along the way, proving itself to be a unique neo-western for the comic book superhero genre.

Supporting performances are also to be commended, although the film is mostly the Hugh Jackman show, and deservedly so. Patrick Stewart returns as his supposed final time as Charles Xavier, and gives a truly emotional and gut wrenching performance as a weakened Xavier, who like Logan, has seen better days. Newcomer Dafne Keen is absolutely fantastic as the young Laura, a.k.a. X-23, and gives one of the best child performances I have seen in a long time. She practically steals the show like Kick-Ass’s Hit Girl character, not only because she kicks a lot of ass, but also because she showcases immense vulnerability and pathos as a young kid conditioned by her violent surroundings. Comedian Stephen Merchant also does great work as a mutant detecting mutant whom is dragged along for the adventure as well. On the villain front, Holbrook is delightfully cheesy yet menacing as the film’s main villain, whom the audience will be begging to see die by the film’s end. The biggest surprise of all, especially for martial arts and COF fans, is an appearance by none other than Daniel Bernhardt (Bloodsport II, John Wick) as one of Holbrook’s mercenaries. He’s not in the film long, but a minor appearance by Bernhardt always makes any movie better.

As much as I enjoyed Logan, the film does succumb to a few minor flaws that prevent it from outright being the masterful Wolverine film it could have been, although it is very close. Although I enjoyed the increased level of violence from previous Wolverine films, Mangold sometimes goes overboard and creates a sense of exhaustion during some of the action sequences, pushing the violence to extremes in parts that I felt were a tad inappropriate. Also, there’s a midpoint twist where a new villain is introduced, and it really took me a back and instantly hurt the entire film as a whole in my opinion. I don’t want to spoil this twist for others, but I will simply state that it was an unnecessary and silly science fiction addition to an otherwise grounded and practical film that did not need it. Also, the death of some notable characters throughout felt poorly handled and quite rushed, from both an emotional stand point regarding characters you love and a satisfying standpoint regarding characters you love to hate. Overall, Logan is great stuff, but a few minor flaws hold it back from being the perfect film it could’ve been, although readers may disagree with my opinion regarding these minor points I made, as they are very subjective.

After 2009’s disappointing X-Men Origins: Wolverine and 2013’s ‘so-close but no cigar’ The Wolverine, Mangold and Jackman have finally given us the definitive Wolverine film with Logan, the ultimate farewell to the character. This blend of neo-western and post-apocalyptic sentiments results in the ultimate genre film that action fans will be talking about for years to come. I know it’s premature to call it, but I highly doubt that any comic book superhero film for the rest of the year, let alone the next few years, will be able to match the pure visceral thrills and emotional ride of Mangold’s latest, as its cinema at its purest. While a tad overlong, the film clocks in a little over two hours, Logan is otherwise a brisk and dramatic adventure that slashes its way through the rest of the comic book superhero competition to rousing effect. Here’s to hoping that Logan reminds all of the other studios out there that not every comic book superhero film has to be connected to others or set up further sequels, as a passionate and daring standalone, especially one for adults, can prove to be infinitely more satisfying than five safe and stale efforts combined. As for Jackman, let’s all pour one out for the entertainer, as he, much like Wolverine, deserves a long rest and retirement for all of the years that he has given too us.

Zach Nix’s Rating: 9/10



This entry was posted in All, Asian Related, News, Other Movies, Reviews and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Logan (2017) Review

  1. “In Jackman’s lifetime as the character, we have been witness to two Batman’s, two Superman’s, two Fantastic Four teams, three Punisher’s, and three Spider-Man’s.”

    Interesting observation. Never thought of it that way. The only other person I can think of who has played a character (of any type) that long is probably William Shatner.

    Your reviews makes me want to cancel my VOD Headshot purchase and run to the theater. 🙂

    Logan is a unique breath of fresh air that reminds us of the old days when adult comic book adaptations like The Crow, Blade, The Punisher, and Watchmen treated audiences like adults and gave them stand alone stories that were films first and foremost, not products.”

    *thumbs up*

  2. ColinJ says:

    I saw it today and absolutely loved it.

    Dare I say that it’s even Oscar-worthy? Maybe this could be the movie that finally breaks the stalemate for superhero movies.

  3. HKFanatic says:

    i can’t say I agree about the violence being too much – it was just right for me – but! I agree with your other two quibbles. For instance, there’s a death in this movie that feels shockingly rushed over. It left me scratching my head, wondering if it was a late addition reshoot or screenplay decision.

    Also, the first time that particular ‘plot twist’ appeared, I was really disappointed; it took me out of the movie, and I was convinced I was going to walk out of LOGAN not as high on it as everyone else was. Fortunately, I think the filmmakers redeemed themselves with an incredibly strong closing act that delivers all the outrageous action and emotionally affecting material that I could possibly want.

    Overall, this film reminded me a bit of John Hyams’ Universal Soldier: Regeneration, in that it takes a masculine action icon we had previously considered impervious and shows us their weak, vulnerable, and incredibly human side. It also has the incredibly punishing and haunting violence of a Hyams’ movie. To think I’m saying this about an X-Men movie is pretty damn shocking…and great. At the risk of sounding hyperbolic, I feel like this has to be the best comic book movie since The Dark Knight.

  4. Kyle Warner says:

    Your review is on point, Zach. Good stuff.

    I loved this movie. Logan is not just a fantastic superhero movie, it is a fantastic film regardless of genre. Violent, high-stakes action driven by raw character drama. It is sad that Hugh Jackman and (likely) Patrick Stewart are retiring from their X-Men roles but it’s hard to imagine a better exit than Logan.

  5. brutalmerc says:

    f*ckin A

  6. Paul Bramhall says:

    I got through watching this one last night, and pretty much agree with Zach’s review. I was actually going to kick off my comment by saying how much ‘Logan’ feels influenced by the 2 John Hyams directed ‘Universal Soldier’ movies, in terms of the plot that eventually emerges, but see that HKFanatic already beat me to it. At least I know I’m not the only one. All in all the chemistry between Jackman and Patrick Stewart is I think what made it such a fantastic piece, and really helped to keep the audience engaged.

    Ironically the final 40 minutes, when it kind of changes tone and becomes ‘Wolverine & the Kids’, were what held my interest the least. Mainly because the kids themselves have no character whatsoever, and are simply there as a (somewhat annoying) plot device that felt like they just came out of ‘Maze Runner’. I wasn’t too sure about the whole X-Men comic being explained as a re-telling of the X-Men’s real life adventures either, something about it just felt a little off. Has the comic ever made an appearance in any other X-Men movie? These are small gripes though, and Jackman gives a fantastic performance as the world weary, down trodden version of the character that put him on the map all those years ago. It gets a definite recommendation from me.

  7. Andrew Hernandez says:

    I had no idea that Logan was reviewed on the site. I would’ve loved to join in the discussion back then.

    I was especially frustrated because while Hugh Jackman was good as always, and the movie is technically well made, it pissed me off.

    I understand that not everyone likes commercial features, and this movie was supposed to be the antithesis to the Marvel and DC films, but the cynicism was too much in the forefront. I felt like there wasn’t any silver lining like there was for Mad Max: Fury Road or even Unforgiven where Eastwood at the very least had something to look forward to.

    I was hoping there would be a good explanation for why Wolverine was aging fast and weaker, and it sucked when it was just “I got old.”

    There were too many afterthoughts in the movie, of particular was the family that helps Wolverine on his journey, and their treatment was just bad.

    I’m a proponent of “show, don’t tell.” The explanation for the rest of the X-Men violated that rule, and was a huge letdown. I always had a problem with how most of the X-Men films made Wolverine more important than the rest of the members, and it disappointed me that they didn’t matter in the long run. Especially since the Marvel films have shown all of their characters as being important.

    The villains of the movie were also a disappointment. Boyd Holdbrook should have been a challenge for Wolverine, but he was useless. And of course Wolverine’s main rival was a completely lazy and stupid choice. He has a catalog of enemies that could have worked for this film, but instead the film makers copped out.

    Headshot came out in theatres on the same day as Logan, and I watched it right after. I felt like it had a somewhat similar plot as it was also about a man forced into becoming an animalistic killing machine who suffers amnesia and has to protect a woman and kid while he’s dying. I thought Headshot did what Logan should have done.

    While Daphe’s X 23 was good in the action, I felt like Hugh Jackman was portrayed as too unrefined and sloppy. I get that he was aged and dying, but I felt like he was less of a killing machine here than in The Wolverine and even X-Men Apocalypse.

    I thought the extended cut of The Wolverine was a more enjoyable film than Logan. It may not have been deep, if I felt like it stood more on its own and showed what the man was capable of while also portraying him as vulnerable.

    I know this all seems like sacrilege, but I’m more upset that I didn’t like Logan as much as everyone else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *