Three (2016) Review

Three | Blu-ray & DVD (Well Go USA)

Three | Blu-ray & DVD (Well Go USA)

Director: Johnnie To
Producer: Johnnie To
Cast: Louis Koo, Wallace Chung, Vicky Zhao Wei, Lam Suet, Lo Hoi-Pang, Timmy Hung, Michael Tse, Eddie Cheung, Mimi Kung, Raymond Wong Ho-Yin, Jonathan Wong, Stephen Au, Mickey Chu, Hedi He
Running Time: 89 min.

By Kyle Warner

After a couple years spent making comedies, director Johnnie To returns to the gritty crime genre with the cops vs. robbers vs. doctors thriller Three. Like all of To’s finest films, Three is positively dripping with style. Near the start is a P.O.V. shot from inside a brain as a scalpel digs in and the film builds to a final act slow-motion shootout that should make any Matrix fan lose their sh*t. And in between these two memorable visual moments, we get a tightly wound thriller with a surprisingly playful script and a strong cast of flawed characters.

Can you tell I liked this movie?

The law’s attempt to arrest a violent crew of thieves only nets them one suspect, Shun (Wallace Chung), and they only nabbed him because he got shot in the head. Shun didn’t die from the wound, though. The bullet is still stuck in his brain, so they rush him to the hospital. Inspector Ken (Louis Koo) watches on nervously as brain surgeon Dr. Tong (Vicky Zhao Wei) preps for surgery. Is Ken concerned for the man he says shot himself in the act of the arrest? Or is Ken more concerned about the violent suspect who, despite his current state, still might pose a threat to the public? When Shun wakes up on the operating table, he freaks out. Not only did Shun survive his headshot wound, he’s apparently suffered zero debilitating physical side effects of hosting a bullet inside his brain. Shun tells Dr. Tong that he doesn’t want surgery, he just wants a phone call. And so, handcuffed to his hospital bed with a time bomb of a health condition, Shun decides to spend what might be his final moments teasing his captors while promising that his men will be coming for him soon enough.

As things progress, we learn more about the characters. Dr. Tong is having a horrible week of failures. So desperate is she to get her confidence back, she’s pushing herself at the cost of her patients. And though she means well, her best intentions nonetheless cause trouble for the cops in the hospital. Inspector Ken, meanwhile, is trying to get the information out of his suspect about how he can track down the other criminals of his crew. Ken’s also dealing with a bit of intrigue about the mysterious circumstances which led to that gun being fired and putting a bullet in Shun’s brain. The villain Shun, who spends most the film in bed, is a well-read lunatic. He’s the sort of villain that I find annoying, but this time I think that’s exactly the point. Shun is a bully, and unable to exert violence on his peers he’s left with taunting words. It’s a character that’s pretty easy to hate, even in his sad state.

Vicky Zhao Wei (Shaolin Soccer) does a fine job as the self-loathing surgeon, likely the most sympathetic character in the film despite her many flaws. Louis Koo has done some of his best work before in To movies (Election 1 & 2, Drug War) and he’s good here, too. Ken is probably the most challenging role in the film; deadly serious most of the time, then suddenly submissive before his bosses, and occasionally faking a sense of humor when the situation calls for it. Wallace Chung is an actor relatively unknown to me, though he’s had roles in Drug War and Monster Hunt before this. Like I said, it’s an annoying character, but I think Chung is pretty convincing in the role. Also starring in a major supporting role is To regular Lam Suet (PTU), here playing a cop named Fatty (surprise) who spends most the film searching for Shun’s accomplices who may be hiding out in plain sight among the hospital visitors.

The entire film takes place on the hospital grounds. What I liked is that the world kept spinning around them, with other investigations and criminal acts taking place somewhere beyond the scope of our film. Three has a ‘real time’ feel to it, though it never embraces such a gimmick. It’s just that it’s so enclosed, so tightly plotted that you’d be forgiven for misremembering a ticking clock graphic somewhere in the movie.  The plot unfolds in an interesting fashion, with every character trying to assert control over the situation and the errors that could bring it all crumbling down. A good deal is spent on minor hospital characters as well, whose antics at first seem to distract from the central story but actually add to it in unexpected ways.

Three isn’t the action-packed shoot ‘em up sort of Johnnie To crime film but the finale has some pretty good bang for your buck. In the final act, when guns are drawn and bullets are exchanged, To uses all his saved up style points on a slow-motion one-shot shoot-out within the hospital. And sure, it’s not a true one-shot sequence. It was achieved by some artificial means, but that doesn’t prevent the wow factor from going into the red.

The film’s not perfect. The sense of humor is off and the use of physically impaired individuals for a laugh reads as infantile (but that’s hardly anything new in a Hong Kong movie). I must also take issue with the final minutes of the movie; after sizzling for so long, the film fizzles out before the credits roll. I have more questions. I require more resolution. I want to stay in this story just a little while longer… but oh well.

A few issues aside, I thought Three was fairly excellent. It’s stylish, clever, tense filmmaking and probably the coolest ‘medical thriller’ since George Clooney left the ER. Johnnie To fits more style into a throwaway shot in a hallway than some directors would reserve for their audience grabbing, trailer spotlight money shot. The film may not be remembered as one of the director’s very best, but it’s a good reminder as to why many consider To one of the coolest directors in the game.

Kyle Warner’s Rating: 8/10

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on TumblrEmail this to someoneShare on Google+

This entry was posted in All, Chinese, News, Reviews and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Three (2016) Review

  1. Paul Bramhall says:

    To think I was tossing up between watching this or ‘Mission Milano’ just last night…if your review had been posted 24 hours earlier I wouldn’t have made such a disastrous choice. Great review Kyle, and after your bold Van Damme stint you certainly deserve to be enjoying the roll of top drawer movies you seem to be on at the moment. It sounds like ‘Three’ is everything that ‘Sky on Fire’ should have been.

  2. Mojj says:

    I thought this was fine, but ultimately my expectations were set at “Drug War” when It was much more like “Life Without Principle” with the spacial awareness of last year’s “Office”.

    Honestly, the little action that is in the film is some of the most poorly staged in To’s wonderful career.

  3. Paul Bramhall says:

    I seem to be currently working through the list of Kyle Warner recommended movies (trademark), so today ‘Three’ found itself up for a viewing. Completely agree with the review, and would have given it the same rating. Loved the one-location setting, a nicely realized cast of characters, and a sense of underlying tension from start to finish (which certainly doesn’t outstay its welcome, the runtime clocks in at less than 90 mins).

    If you compare Louis Koo’s performance in this to that in ‘Call of Heroes’ made the same year, you’d be convinced they’re 2 different actors. To once again proves that he’s able to draw the best out of Koo and his perma-tan, as he does with the rest of the cast.

    There were a couple of very minor niggles. This is the 2nd HK movie I’ve watched in as many years (the 1st being ‘SPL 2: A Time for Consequences’) which features a scene with characters dangling precariously from a very tall building, with no explanation as to exactly how they get back to safety (both scenes simply cut away to shots where everyone is fine). To also has to round off proceedings with an obligatory scene tacked on to ensure it passes the China censors (because God forbid the police not be shown to be “doing the right thing”), however he gets points for even using this short piece of screen time to throw in a nice little twist.

    All in all, a great review for a great movie.

    • Zach Nix says:

      I just watched Three and I thought it was a good little movie, although the end really let me down (spoilers ahead for those who haven’t seen it). It’s representative of the slow burn pot broiler style, that Drug War is very much like. And while I thought that the first two acts were fantastic, I really felt that the big showdown was very disappointing. I did not care for the big one shot action sequence. I kept feeling bummed out about all of the innocent people dying left and right. I didn’t feel like any of the characters cared about that loss. Also, what the heck was up with the computer generated hospital room when the paralyzed patient falls down the stairs? And also the exterior of the building. When Louis Koo was hanging from the building, it was easily some of the worst green screen I have ever seen. It’s a real shame that this awful CGI works its way into a lot of modern Hong Kong/Chinese action movies. And than the conclusion/denouement was very rushed, with character arcs being completely far too quickly. Koo’s turn from “I’m going to kill this guy,” to all of a sudden choosing to save him and realize his mistakes happened far too suddenly. I appreciated the short run time and minimal locations, but felt that the ending hurt the film for me. I’d rank this more towards To films like Fulltime Killer, in that it has potential, and flashes of brilliance, but does not come together the way masterful efforts of his like Vengeance, Exiled, and Drug War do.

    • Kyle Warner says:

      “If you compare Louis Koo’s performance in this to that in ‘Call of Heroes’ made the same year, you’d be convinced they’re 2 different actors.”

      Can you imagine Koo playing the villain, Shun? Could’ve sunk the movie, I think. Koo’s a natural movie star but not much of a character actor.

      Glad ya liked this one more than Call of Heroes! I like ’em both, but for totally different reasons. That being said, I get that both have their fair share of issues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *